The position of the echnida on Australia's 5c piece has moved with respect to the top and bottom rims on a number of occasions since the introduction of the design in 1966. In 1984 the then in-use high echidna reverse began to be phased out in favour of a new low echinda reverse. The reason in unknown but it has been suggested that a new master die was bought into use (Andrews, http://www.thesandpit.net/index.php?option=five_cent_different_echidnas). The difference is easy to spot by looking at the distance between the designer's initials SD and the rim, though on some coins the rim is quite tapered and the SD appears further from the rim than it really is.
The new low echidna is somewhat scarce in the 1984 mintage and so was probably introduced later in the year. No circulating 5c pieces were produced in 1985 or 1986 but both high and low echinda coins are known in 1986 mint sets with the the low echinda now being more common. High echnida coins are also known in 1987 but are rare and are probably the result of a single die. The 1987 high echinda 5c piece is probably the rarest circulating 5c piece.
While a 1985 low echinda would be expected, none have ever been reported or found. It is possible that the production of 1985 mint sets was completed before the new reverse was introduced. At least in recent times, mint sets have been released in November or December of the previous year so mint set production occurring before the introduction of the new reverse is not unlikely. Or it may simply be that the reverse dies used to produce the 1985 mint sets all happened to be high echidna. In any case, the 1985 low echinda 5c piece probably does not exist.
In mid-October 2018 Australian coin collectors began to notice 2019-dated one dollar coins in their change: besides the unexpected year, the standard mob of roos reverse also bore an extra 35 between two of the kangaroos and a privy-mark with one of the letters A, U and S. There was early speculation that the Royal Australian Mint had accidentally released some non-circulating coins into circulation both due to the early appearance of 2019-dated coins and the fact that privy-marks had only been seen on non-circulating coins until that point. The Royal Australian Mint were quick to affirm that the release of the coins was no accident and that their purpose would be revealed soon (Chung, https://finance.nine.com.au/2018/10/16/14/23/time-travelling-coin).
On November 1st 2018 the Royal Australian Mint revealed that the one million of each of the privy-marked coins had been released as part of a competition in the lead-up to the 35th anniversary of Australia’s one dollar coin. To encourage coin collecting, people who found each of the coins in their change were eligible to enter the Dollar Discovery competition at https://dollardiscovery.com.au/ with eight major prizes of a tour of the Royal Australian Mint and a 1 kilogram silver coin.
While Australian decimal mules are not unheard of, genuine production error mules as opposed to creative mint workers intentionally mixing and matching dies almost never occur. The first and only known occurrence to date at the Royal Australian Mint was in 2000 when a small number of standard mob of roos one dollar coins were accidentally produced with a 10c obverse die. Given the small difference in size between the one dollar and 10c obverse dies - a mere 1.6mm - it easy to see how such a mix-up could have occurred. Genuine 2000 dollar mules are quite easy to spot by their double/stepped obverse rim. The double/stepped obverse rim can be off centre and not run around the entire obverse: a well-centred and complete double/stepped obverse rim will generally sell for more.
The 2000 dollar mule was first publicised in the February 2002 Australasian Coin and Banknote Magazine where a reader named Dave Potts on the New South Wales Central Coast reported an unusual 2000 one dollar coin which he and Alan McInnes concluded was struck with a 10c obverse die. In the September 2004 Australasian Coin and Banknote Magazine Ian McConnelly offered an update on the 2000 dollar mule and reported at least 20 known examples with the locations implying mules being found most commonly in New South Wales, Victoria and Western Australia. Apparently a majority of the mules were released into circulation in Perth with a large amount being found there (Harris, https://www.australian-coins.com/error-coins/2000-1-10-cent-mule/).
The Royal Australian Mint has been quiet on the subject but reportedly an employee anonymously divulged that the mistake was contained to a single incorrect obverse die and when the mistake was discovered during production, there was an effort to destroy all of the mules. Evidently a small number of mules went unfound and were subsequently released into circulation. It has been reported that all known mules have identical reeding alignment which would confirm that the mules came from a single die run.
The number of mules that entered circulation is unknown and probably never will be but collector Bruce Mansfield advises that in the 31,546 2000-dated one dollar coins he searched, he found 41 mules. From this sample it can be assumed that 0.13% of 2000-dated one dollar coins were mules, and given the total mintage of 2000-dated one dollar coins is 7,592,000 it can be estimated that approximately 9,800 mules survived and entered circulation. Regardless, the 2000 dollar mule is one of Australia's rarest decimal coins.
Although the Royal Australian Mint’s website records 1992 mob of roos one dollar coins as having been struck for circulation (https://www.ramint.gov.au/one-dollar) it is almost certainly in error. No 1992 one dollar coins were issued for circulation at all: a one dollar coin commemorating the 1992 Barcelona Olympic Games was struck only for mint and proof sets in 1992 and it was intended to be the only one dollar design for that year.
The Royal Australian Mint’s website states that 0.008 million (8,000) mob of roos dollars dated 1992 were produced for circulation but this is a transcription of a likely erroneous entry in the 1992 Royal Australian Mint Annual Report. It is widely believed that the 8,000 one dollar coins in question were actually dated 1984 and 1985 and were retrospectively produced in 1992 for a set of five one dollar coins containing 1984, 1985, 1986, 1988 and 1992 one dollar coins. The complete lack of any reported 1992 mob of roos dollar from circulation helps to confirm that the website is in in error and that no such coin exists.
In recent years the existence of a proof 1992 mob of roos dollar has come to light. An example sold in Downies auction 310 as lot 2493 in February 2012 (https://issuu.com/downies/docs/auction_310_session_6) and was described as “One Dollar 1992 with Mob of ‘Roos reverse struck on a partially prepared proof blank, As Struck and extremely rare”. Curiously the lot was not illustrated but it sold for $1000 against its $750 estimate regardless. The circumstances of its production remain unclear but it seems probable that it was an unauthorised production by creative mint staff given that it was struck on a partially-prepared planchet.
The Indian Princely State of Sailana was comparatively late in its issue of its uniform-like coinage. India began its issue of uniform coinage in 1862 and the other Princely States that issued coinages in the same form all did so in the later part of the 19th century: Sailana however began its uniform-like coinage in the early 20th century (p389, Wiggins, British Commonwealth Coins, 1971).
Before Sailana's uniform-like coinage it issued copper paisas between 1871 and 1887 (p389, Wiggins, British Commonwealth Coins, 1971). It did not issue any further coins until its uniform-like coinage which consisted only of quarter annas in 1908 and 1912 (p389, Wiggins, British Commonwealth Coins, 1971).